Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Lady Porn Day ~ sex, masturbation & feminism

 

I need a break from the heavy stuff. The past few posts have been really weighty with world issues, suicide, murder, hate, rape…. honestly, my readers are going to think I’m morbidly incapable of ever seeing the bright side of life!

Not true. So let’s talk about porn.

Today is Lady Porn Day, a twitter and blogging phenomenon that is the brainchild of Chicago-based sex, gender and sexuality journalist Rachel Rabbit White, whose writing centres on creating a public discourse on private matters. Rabbit wants women in the blogosphere to talk openly and engage in discussions on sexuality, masturbation and porn – still taboo subjects for most women, no matter where in the world you live – and so she declared a day for it. The worldwide media has picked up on it and Twitter has been abuzz with thousands of tweets all day under the hashtag #LadyPornDay, with women (and men and gender-queer and people who refuse standard gender designations) chiming in with their joys, fears, laughs and tears all around the notion of porn.

vanessawilliamspenthouse_01So here is mine: porn is just fine with me. I don’t indulge in it very often (not as often as I’d like), but I don’t avoid it either. I’m a grown up. I like it (well I like what I like, anyway – mostly stuff that falls under the rubric of queer porn or feminist porn). And as a woman and a feminist, I refuse to be treated like a child and told that I am a victim of it. In a world where women are discouraged from owning their desires, where our bodies are invaded by governments and cultures who want to control what goes into them and what comes out of them, watching porn and publicly declaring that you do, is a radical act.

I first came across porn as a kid, when I realised that my dad had a subscription to Playboy. They came in unmarked brown wrappers back in those days, every month and, budding Agatha Christie that I was, over time I found out where he hid the stash, and I had a look. I didn’t like everything I saw. But that’s life. I was not scarred or damaged, nor did I turn into a serial killer (seriously: all things anti-porn activists will have you believe happens to any child or teen the moment their eyes touch a sliver of erotica or porn). I just saw some lovely bodies doing some interesting things that got me thinking about doing that thing I had figured out to do when I was alone and interested in making the day all warm and smiley. I liked the women’s bodies, but there was precious little to see of men’s, and while I knew that what they were doing with one another was sex, I wasn’t overly impressed by that part. I liked to just see the beautiful bodies and… honestly, really…. I enjoyed reading the journalism and the stories (I’m serious). But mainly, I enjoyed the thrill of the chase – sleuthing out those magazines was mostly about savvy and brains: I sussed out the secret behind the brown wrappers, I figured out where they were hidden, I evaded detection – I could slip every single magazine back in place leaving a trail so slight only a contemporary Quantico-trained forensic profiler could ascertain that I had been there. I was good. It made me feel smart, sassy and powerful. So, strangely, my first experience of porn had very little to do with sex and pictures, and much more to do with feeling that if I put my mind to it, I could do pretty much anything… without getting caught by my parents.

vanessa-williams-penthouse-nudes-lesbian-2My most influential experience with porn, though, came with the Vanessa Williams Miss America/Penthouse scandal of 1984. I was 17. She was the first black Miss America – something a black girl growing up in the 1970s and 80s never thought could happen. No way. But it did. And I remember exactly how I was sitting in front of that television that night, mouth hanging open, breathless, chanting “She’s gonna win, she’s gonna win,” and wisely being told by my mother, who didn’t want to see me hurt, “No, honey. Don’t get your hopes up.” Because in those days black girls (of any skin shade) did not win Miss America. But Vanessa did. And it was like the world changed. And she was from my home town (well almost; a few miles away, but close enough), and I could not believe how unfathomably beautiful she was, and nothing could ever tarnish this feeling that no one could ever tell an African-American girl she was ‘black and ugly’ again damnit! That’s how I felt and that’s how important her victory was to so many black girls at the time…. and then a magazine I had not read called Penthouse broke a scandal that was meant to take all that away from me. Except, it didn’t.

I was too young to buy a copy, but I knew I had to get hold of one. And then one of the neighbourhood kids said something about his grandmother having a copy, because she thought this was a key historical moment for black people, even if it was a scandal, and we could get a quick peek of it if we ran over there right away. And a quick peak was all we got. And we were not allowed to look at any other part of the magazine. That history lesson – which to me was one about racism, sexism, homophobia and how if you rose ‘too high’ some people would try to bring you down – was marked for me by one particular photo of Vanessa and the other woman with their bodies forming a heart, tenderly embracing. I thought it was lovely – how could anyone not like this. I could not understand what the fuss was all about. Only later did it dawn on me that this was America’s newly crowned sweetheart and icon of purity engaged in a queer, interracial embrace. No wonder some folks went apoplectic. She had broken far too many taboos.

vanessa-williams-300x179So my first experiences of porn were both very political and very personal. They were not marked, as some would have it, by abuse or tragedy or me learning a distorted sense of myself or what ‘real’ sex was about. I am not saying that there is no destructive porn out there…. so much of the porn made by men (sorry guys, but particularly, historically, straight white male porn producers) can be downright distorting and disgusting (to me; this is my personal opinion, which is why it’s on my own damned blog) and, yes, degrading to women. But to say all erotica or porn is cut from the same cloth is foolish.

To say that women who want to cannot and should not educate and claim their sexuality partially through an exposure to porn is to infantalise us and remove our right to decide for ourselves. To say that all porn is bad just buys into the notion that sex by its nature is corrupting and ‘good girls’ need to be saved from seeing or reading about it except in officially sanctioned media.

So, as a grown up, I began to watch the work of women sex-educators and pornographers like Tristan Taormino and read the works of sex-positive feminist such as Susie Bright – both of whom happen to be bisexual or queer. There’s another blog post here somewhere about why so many sex-positive or sex-radical feminist are also bisexual… but that is for another day. For now, it’s very late in Britain, it’s crossed midnight – but in North America and elsewhere, it’s still Lady Porn Day. Go enjoy!

 


Thursday, 3 February 2011

‘Bisexevil’ ~ Uganda: hate in focus

 

r-UGANDA-GAY-PROTEST-large570



When I saw this now almost-iconic image of Ugandan anti-LGBT sentiment in a news report back in 2010, I didn’t notice at first that the text on the hand-drawn sign forged a pun: bi-sex evil = bisexevil = bisexual.

Bigot humour. How droll.

Actually, what I’d noticed first was the determined period or full-stop at the end of the words, as if what was scrawled on this sign was actually a sentence and what it had to say was the final word on the matter. But then I noticed the teenaged girl’s eyes.

I didn’t see hate in those eyes the first time I saw this photo. I still don’t. The girl seems muddled, seeking direction, not entirely in control of the hateful spirit in the note she holds. The paper partially obscures her face – her mouth, actually – as if she’s not sure of her own words, so she’s letting the sign speak for her. She doesn’t exhibit the wild-eyed rancour or grim-fisted visage I’ve seen in other photographs, though she is rather riveted to what I assume is a person speaking at some spot in the distance. A pulpit, maybe? The people behind her are blurred, but they are in relatively disciplined rows and the crisp, clean shirts in focus add to the feel that this is a ‘Sunday best’ environment. I’m going with that – church. And in reading this image further, I’m going with the narrative that this girl, seeking leadership from the pulpit, either picked up or scribbled this sign in an attempt to curry favour with the crowd around her, the people she came with, and most importantly the ‘leader’ in front of her on whom she fixes her eyes: Look at me. See what I have here. I’m listening to you. I have no mouth of my own, carve me one with your words. I will follow your lead.

Hate is taught. And she is learning.

Fundamentalist religion in Uganda, all across Africa and the world, is leading the battle to attack lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, to deny them human rights, civil rights and even life. Home-grown Ugandan religious-based hatred is being buffeted by imported American evangelical Christians and their ’cures’ for what ails the non-heterosexual, non-gender-normative members of society. They begin by maliciously defining what LGBT people are: gay men are, by their definition, nothing but coprophagiacs and paedophiles; lesbians are mentally ill women pretending to be men and, as with the more highly publicised cases in South Africa, they can be cured by rape, often at the hands of relatives; transgender people are invaded by the spirits of dead people of opposite genders and can become victims of ‘crusades’ that use sexual and physical abuse to cleanse them; and bisexuals are recklessly predatory AIDS-carriers incapable of not forcing sexual relations with anyone in their sight and are thereby ‘evil’ – full-stop.

All LGBT people in Uganda live with the risk of shameless attacks on the street, in their homes, in churches, in sports facilities, anywhere someone chooses to shout out ‘there is one!’ and draw attention to them or, worse, cause an impromptu mob to attack. They risk loss of employment, mental and emotional abuse by strangers and loved ones alike, and often when they suffer from alcoholism, depression, suicidal  thoughts, extreme stress, peer pressure, threats of divorce or relationship break-up, they cannot access appropriate psychological and health care, because that means having to out themselves and their partners to medical personnel.

When LGBT people complain about such treatment and the enormous pressure it places on their lives, the response from religious leaders, politicians, medical professionals, educators, and society at large: repent. Just stop your wicked ways.

Well, gay men cannot and should not be asked ‘to repent’, if that means to never love, never make love, or to forever live hiding in a soul-destroying closet. Lesbians cannot just ‘be discreet’, wear frilly dresses and avoid reading lesbian magazines, so as not to draw attention to themselves. Transgendered people cannot just forget their needs and feelings and happily subsume themselves in the gender assigned to them at birth, occasionally attending ceremonies to clean their spirits. And bisexuals cannot indiscriminately choose any partner of the opposite sex to hide behind just ‘because they can’ and forever deny their ability to love someone whatever their gender and all the personal, social, communal and political realities that come with having that orientation to life.

The prevalent accusation in the west that bisexuals can never be taken seriously in the fight for LGBT rights because they can always hide under ‘heterosexual privilege’, just choosing opposite sex partners (no matter whom they have actually fallen in love with) and eschewing their ‘gay side’ in order to avoid persecution – this is a moot point in Uganda, where the bisexual movement has risen to stand alongside other fellow LGBTI fighters for human rights. Bisexuals are visible and working for change. Ugandan LGBTI individuals do indeed have to hide much of themselves on a day-to-day basis to protect their lives and livelihoods, but as a group and a force, the LGBTI community of Uganda is one of the most visible, brave and determined the world has seen.

And because of the murder of teacher and activist David Kato, the highly publicised deportation case of asylum seeker Brenda Namigadde, and the threat of the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’ and same-sex relationships in Uganda, the world is beginning to take notice.

They deserve our support, not just in sentiment, but in donations to relevant activist groups, student organisations, churches and charities that help LGBT people, calls and emails to our political representatives, making our supportive voices heard in the media, and determining that no matter what sexual orientation we are that when we hear homophobic, biphobic or transphobic statements about people in Uganda (or anywhere in the world), that we speak up and let it be known that we do not adhere to such ideas and we will not tolerate hate around us. Each of us is just one voice, but our voices add up to change.

 

I am only one. But still I am one. I cannot do everything,
but still I can do something. I will not refuse
to do the something I can do.
~ Helen Keller
 
alg_david-kato
 
David Kato Kisule, 1964-2011